🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam decision, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to implement a redrawn congressional district plan that may create up to five new conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three order, issued on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to overturn a federal judge's ruling that had struck down the new map in November.

Court's Rationale

The district court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating much confusion and disrupting the fine federal-state balance in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its ruling.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had likely grouped voters based on their race – a act known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the new maps. It had mandated the state to employ the boundaries created after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Strong Dissenting Opinion

In a forcefully written dissent, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's ruling. She contended that it undermined the work of the district court, noting that its opinion was actually authored by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas residents, unjustly, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a infraction of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Struggle

This decision occurs during a nationwide battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican control. Usually, redistricting happens after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that might create a number of more Republican-leaning seats. The opposition, for their part, have responded with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Political Responses

The Texas AG welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order upheld Texas's basic authority to draw a map that ensures representation supportive of the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

On the other hand, Democratic leaders decried the ruling. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the chair of a major party campaign committee.

Another leading House figure stated the court had yet again shredded its standing by upholding a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he concluded.